Skip to content
DatingSiteSpot
Article tools & info
Reviewed Jul 6, 2026 · DatingSiteSpot editorial teambyDatingSiteSpot Editorial
Romance Scam Checker: a private nine-question gut-check built on the FTC and FBI's published red flags

Dating • Safety

Romance Scam Checker: 9 Questions Built on FTC Red Flags

A private, nine-question gut-check built from the exact red flags the FTC and FBI publish. It runs entirely in your browser — nothing you tap is stored, sent, or tracked. It is not a diagnosis and it can't tell you for certain that a person is a scammer; what it does is show you, honestly, how closely your situation matches the pattern federal investigators describe — and what to do next.

3 min read

This is the standalone version of the risk check from our full report on romance scams in 2026 — the same nine questions, on their own page, with the red-flag mapping and the reporting steps alongside them. If you want the data behind it — the scale of the problem, how the con is run, and the fund-recovery paths in depth — read the full piece. If you just want to run your own situation against the flags, do that first, right here.

One thing up front, because it matters: this is not a diagnosis. No checklist can prove that someone is a scammer, and a low score is not a clean bill of health. What the check gives you is an honest read on how closely what you're experiencing matches the documented pattern — and, either way, the single rule that stops every version of this.

Interactive · private

Romance Scam Risk Check

Answer honestly. This is a private gut-check built from the exact red flags the FTC and FBI publish — not a diagnosis. The more that sound familiar, the more it’s worth stopping to look closer.

How it started, how it feels

You met online and have never met in person — and every plan to meet or video-chat falls through.
Their photos look polished, even model-perfect, but they won’t get on a live video call.
They pushed to move off the dating app fast — to WhatsApp, Telegram, or text.
It turned intensely romantic within days, well before you’d actually met.
They’ve encouraged you to keep the relationship secret from friends or family.
The details keep shifting, and there’s always a fresh crisis.

The ask— any one of these is the line

They’ve asked you for money, a wire transfer, or gift-card numbers.
They’ve offered to help you make money — especially by “investing” in crypto.
They said a valuable package or payment is stuck and you need to cover a fee or customs charge.
Have you already sent money, cryptocurrency, or gift-card codes?
0 of 9 answered

This check runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you tap is saved, sent, or shared — there’s no server, no storage, and no tracking behind it.

How the nine questions map to the red flags

The questions aren't ours in spirit — they're a structured version of the red flags the FTC and FBI have published for years. Here's what each group is really testing.

How it started, how it feels (the first six). These are the behavioural tells federal investigators describe, and they stack: you met online and can never quite meet in person or on live video; the photos look polished but a real-time call never happens; the conversation moved off the dating app to WhatsApp, Telegram, or text unusually fast; it turned intensely romantic within days; you've been nudged to keep it secret; and the story keeps shifting around a fresh crisis. None of these proves a scam alone — but the FTC lists the "can never meet, always a reason" pattern (an overseas military posting, an offshore oil rig) as a signature tell[1]. The polished-photo-but-never-live problem is now often an AI one: the FBI's 2025 report says scammers are "creating fake profiles and scripts produced by AI chat generators," which is exactly why a face can look flawless and still never appear on video[2]. It's the same synthetic-persona problem we cover in are AI girlfriends safe, pointed at your wallet instead of your loneliness.

The ask (the last three — the bright line). These are different in kind, which is why any single "yes" reads High on its own: they've asked for money, a wire, or gift-card numbers; they've offered to help you "invest," especially in crypto; or a valuable package is "stuck" behind a fee. The FTC's rule cuts through all of it — anyone you met online who asks you to pay by cryptocurrency, gift card, or wire transfer is a scammer[1]. There's no version of that request that turns out fine.

What each risk tier means — and what to do

The check sorts your answers into one of three reads, and the guidance under each is deliberate.

  • High risk appears when you flag any single money/crypto/gift-card ask, or when four or more behavioural signs stack. Treat it as a scam: send nothing, cut contact, screenshot the profile and chats before they vanish, and report it.
  • Concerning means several early-stage signs are present but the money ask hasn't arrived. It doesn't prove a scam — it's the runway one usually takes. Draw the line before money ever enters the conversation: reverse-image-search the photos and ask for a live video call, which a real person can do and a scammer will stall on.
  • Low concern means nothing you flagged is a definitive sign. Keep the one rule that stops every version of this — no one you've only met online should ever get your money, your crypto, or your gift-card codes — and trust the instinct if something still feels off.

If you've already sent money, speed decides whether you get it back. Contact your bank or the payment app immediately and ask them to recall the transfer, then file with the FBI. Its rapid-freeze process clawed back $679 million in 2025 — but only on wire and bank transfers caught fast, not on cryptocurrency, which is effectively gone once it leaves your wallet[2]. Report every case, regardless of the amount, to the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov and the FBI at ic3.gov.

Your privacy — in plain language

The checker runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you tap is saved, sent, or shared: there's no server behind it, no storage, and no tracking. Your answers never leave the device you're reading this on, and closing the page erases them. That's a deliberate design choice on a page about people being exploited — a tool that asks you to describe a private, painful situation has no business keeping a copy of it.

Sources

Every numbered claim in this review links back to a source below.

  1. Federal Trade Commission — 'Love stinks — when a scammer is involved' (Feb 2024): the can-never-meet / military-and-oil-rig tells, the off-platform push, and the bright-line rule that anyone you met online who asks you to pay by crypto, gift card, or wire is a scammer· accessed Jul 6, 2026
  2. FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center — 2025 Annual Report: scammers 'creating fake profiles and scripts produced by AI chat generators'; the Financial Fraud Kill Chain froze $679M in 2025 (bank/wire transfers, not crypto)· accessed Jul 6, 2026
Is there a test to tell if someone is a romance scammer?
There's no test that can prove it, and you should distrust any tool that claims to. What the checker on this page does instead is measure how closely your situation matches the red flags the FTC and FBI publish — the can-never-meet pattern, the fast push off-platform, the intense early intimacy, and above all any request for money, gift cards, or crypto. A single money ask from someone you've only met online is enough on its own. Treat the result as a structured second opinion, not a verdict, and pair it with a reverse-image search of the profile photos and a request for a live video call.
How do I check if I'm being scammed online?
Run your situation through the nine questions above — they're a structured version of the federal red-flag list — and pay closest attention to 'the ask.' Per the FTC, anyone you met online who asks you to pay by cryptocurrency, gift card, or wire transfer is a scammer, full stop; that single sign outweighs everything else. Beyond the checker, reverse-image-search their photos, insist on a live video call (a real person can, a scammer stalls), keep the relationship on the platform where you met, and describe it out loud to someone you trust — scammers rely on isolating you, so saying it aloud is often when it becomes obvious.
Is this romance scam checker anonymous?
Yes, completely. The checker runs entirely in your browser — there is no server behind it, nothing is stored, and nothing you tap is sent, logged, or tracked. Your answers never leave your device, and closing the page erases them. We built it that way on purpose: a tool that asks you to describe a private, painful situation should never keep a copy of it. The only outbound links are to the FTC and FBI reporting pages and our own editorial.
Can a checklist prove a romance scam?
No — and that's the honest limit of any tool like this, including ours. A checklist can show you how strongly your situation matches the documented pattern, but it can't confirm intent, and romance scams are engineered to look fine right up until the money question arrives. So a low score is not a clean bill of health. Keep the one rule that holds regardless of the score: no one you've only met online should ever get your money, your crypto, or your gift-card codes. If something still feels off after a reassuring result, that instinct is worth more than the checklist.

Our receipts

Sources, test data, and disclosures that informed this review.

  • Test methodology
    This is a tool, not a diagnosis. Every one of the nine questions is a structured restatement of a red flag the FTC or FBI publishes — nothing here is a new claim. The scoring follows the federal guidance rather than our opinion: any single money, crypto, or gift-card ask is the bright line the FTC draws, so one 'yes' there reads High on its own; the behavioural signs stack. We took no affiliate money on this page and place no ads against the fear it describes.
  • Pricing verification
    The red flags behind the questions are drawn from primary federal sources — the FTC's 'Love stinks' guidance and its romance-scam data spotlight, and the FBI's IC3 2025 Annual Report — the same documents behind our full romance-scams explainer. The $679M rapid-freeze figure and the AI-profile note are the FBI's IC3 2025 numbers. Verified 2026-07-06.
  • Reviewer disclosures
    There are no affiliate cards and no calls to action on this page by design. The checker itself stores nothing and sends nothing — it runs entirely in your browser, with no server, no storage, and no tracking behind it. The only outbound links are to the FTC, the FBI, and our own independent editorial.
  • Update log (1)

    Revision dates — this review is kept current as products and pricing change.

    • Jul 6, 2026

How did this article land?

Found something wrong? Let us know. Saved articles live at /saved/.