How we tested 3Fun
We score 3Fun across experience, value, audience and safety, then compare it against the category where it actually competes.
- Free-tier checked
- Audience fit reviewed
- Ranking cross-checked
Screenshot
What 3Fun actually looks like.

Most mainstream apps treat non-monogamy as a checkbox bolted onto a one-to-one product. 3Fun is built the other way around: threesomes, swinging and open relationships are the whole premise, couple and paired-profile accounts are a first-class option, and the audience opts in for exactly that. It's a real product with a real niche userbase — and it also carries a documented security record that we can't ignore and won't bury.
Who it's for
3Fun is for adults who already know they're looking for threesomes, swinging or non-monogamous connections and want a product where that's the default rather than something to explain. It works for couples browsing together as much as for singles. If you want traditional one-to-one dating, this is the wrong app — and if a past data-exposure incident is a dealbreaker for you given how sensitive this category is, read the safety section below before you sign up.
What it does well
The free tier is the standout. You can match and message without paying, which is rare for a hookup-intent app where the inbox is usually the wall you hit first. First-hand, the app itself is easy to live with: a clean swipe interface familiar to anyone who's used Tinder, working video calls inside matches, broad gender and orientation option sets, and a screenshot-block on profiles so people can't quietly grab your photos. The audience is the other real asset — with millions of downloads and a large active base, it's one of the few apps where the non-monogamy niche has genuine scale instead of a near-empty feed, at least in big cities.
Where it costs you — the security record
This is the part that pulls the score down, and it's the reason 3Fun sits below Feeld on our open-minded list despite a bigger free tier. In 2019, security firm Pen Test Partners published a study finding that 3Fun exposed users' real-time location, photos, date of birth and private chat data — even when users had set their location to be hidden — with the researcher calling it among the worst security he had seen in a dating app. 3Fun stated at the time that it had fixed the flaws. We have not independently re-tested the app's current security, so we treat this as a documented past finding with remediation we can't confirm — not a current live breach, but not a clean bill of health either. In a category this sensitive, an app that handles location, photos and explicit preferences has to clear a higher bar than a mainstream dating app, and a history like this means we grade safety well below the rest of the list and tell you plainly so you can weigh it yourself.
What you'd pay for
3Fun is freemium. The genuinely useful free tier covers matching and messaging, which is enough to judge whether your area has a real pool. The paid tier unlocks instant matching, unlimited likes, messaging before matching, incognito mode and location change — and the upsell prompts surface often. We'd only pay once the free tier has shown there's an active audience near you; in thin markets, paying won't conjure people who aren't there. Watch the auto-renewing subscription terms, as with any app in this category.
The bottom line
3Fun earns a spot on our open-minded list as a real, large, genuinely-free-to-message app for threesomes and non-monogamy — first-hand, it's easy to use and the niche has actual scale. It ranks second, behind Feeld, because Feeld pairs a comparable niche focus with a cleaner record, while 3Fun carries a documented data-exposure history we can't verify as fully resolved. If the free tier shows an active pool near you and you go in with eyes open on the privacy trade-off, it's a usable pick; if a past leak of exactly the data this app holds is a dealbreaker, that's a completely fair reason to choose differently.
Strengths & weaknesses
The honest balance sheet.
What works
- Free messaging is genuinely usable — you can match and chat without paying, which is unusual for a hookup-intent app where the inbox is normally the paywall
- A real, large niche audience built specifically around threesomes, swinging and non-monogamy, with couple and paired-profile accounts as a first-class option rather than a workaround
- Clean, familiar swipe interface with working video calls and a profile screenshot-block — first-hand it's one of the easier niche apps to actually use day to day
What doesn't
- Documented security failure: a 2019 study by Pen Test Partners found the app exposed users' real-time location, photos, chat and private data, and the researcher described it as among the worst app security he had seen. 3Fun said it patched the issues at the time; we have not independently re-verified the fix, so we treat its security as unproven rather than cleared and grade it down on that basis
- Fake and recycled profiles are a recurring complaint, and the upsell pressure is heavy — instant matching, unlimited likes, incognito mode and location change all sit behind a steep paid tier
- The pool thins fast outside dense cities — in major metros the daily feed is workable, but the niche makes the drop-off sharper than a mainstream app at the same address
Who should use it
Use 3Fun if any of this is you.
- You want low-friction matching with minimal onboarding.
Who should skip it
Skip 3Fun if any of this is you.
- You're dating in the 50+ bracket and want age-matched pools.
- Faith alignment is a hard filter for you.
Pricing reality check
FreemiumUsable free tier, but upgrades may affect visibility or messaging.
You can sign up and use the product without paying, but features that nudge replies or surface profiles are usually behind a paid plan.
- Free tier
- Yes
- Messaging access
- Free tier with paid upgrades
- Upgrade pressure
- Moderate
Editor’s alternatives
Three reviews to read before you commit to 3Fun.
Picked from sites that share the same audience and category placements as 3Fun. No paid placements.
Feeld6.2/10
A coherent open-minded dating app for non-monogamous and curious adults — strong fit inside its niche, the wrong recommendation for anyone shopping for a traditional mainstream pool.
Shares: best-open-minded-dating-apps
Read reviewOkCupid7.6/10
The strongest free-tier dating product on the market, especially for members who want compatibility signals beyond a photo.
Read reviewZoosk7.3/10
A mainstream casual-leaning freemium product worth listing for broad reach, but the paywalled inbox and heavy upsell surface keep it behind OkCupid and POF for casual intent.
Read review
Read on
How 3Fun fits the rest of our coverage.
Pulled from the live content graph: editor-tested intents this product plausibly fits, and head-to-heads against brands we already rank.
Best for
Compared with
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about 3Fun.
Generated from this review’s scoring + your-actually-asked questions. No invented numbers.
- Is 3Fun worth it?
- Our editor scored 3Fun 5.3/10. A real, large non-monogamy and threesome app that's genuinely free to message and easy to use — but a documented security breach that exposed users' location, photos and chats is a serious mark against it, and the pool thins fast outside big cities.
- Is 3Fun free?
- Partially — there's a free tier, but key features (typically messaging) sit behind a paid plan.
- Who is 3Fun best for?
- 3Fun is best for casual daters who want low-friction matching.
- What is the biggest downside of 3Fun?
- By the numbers, 3Fun scores lowest on safety and moderation (3.8/10) — that's the trade-off to weigh first. The strengths-and-weaknesses breakdown above lays out the specifics.
- What is the best alternative to 3Fun?
- If 3Fun doesn't fit, we'd start with Feeld — see /sites/feeld/.
Where this also appears
3Fun is ranked in one other list.
Same review, scored against different lists. Each link below is the editorial ranking for that audience or use case.
Reviewed by
DatingSiteSpot Editorial
Independent review team · DatingSiteSpot
The DatingSiteSpot editorial team has reviewed dating and adult platforms since 2014. Every verdict comes from first-hand testing on accounts we create and pay for ourselves — no press kits, no stock screenshots, no AI mockups, no sponsored placements.
Methods · Dating app testing · Editorial reviews · Consumer comparison
Editorial review protocol
Read methodology →UX
tested signup → first match
Value
free tier vs paid wall
Audience
pool quality + fit
Safety
privacy + abuse signals
Score
overall on 10
Reviewed against the active 23-site category — every site we cover is scored on the same five axes.
Author focus
- Usability
- Pricing transparency
- Audience fit
- Privacy signals
Method · Five-axis rubric application · Paid-flow testing · Onboarding friction analysis · Cancellation flow documentation
- Reviewed
- · refreshed when the review or pricing changes
- Corrections
- [email protected]
Editorial protocol
- Reviewed using the same 5-axis rubric as every ranking.
- Corrections reviewed manually — no auto-publish.
- Affiliate relationships do not change the score (editorial policy).
- Tested on a real account — see how we test.